Current:Home > StocksA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -ChatGPT
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-19 10:09:48
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (98684)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Caitlin Clark just made her WNBA debut. Here's how she and her team did.
- Scheffler looks to the weekend after a long, strange day at the PGA Championship
- Why Jessica Biel Almost Quit Hollywood
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Three men charged in drive-by shooting that led to lockdown in Maine
- Attorney John Eastman pleads not guilty to felony charges in Arizona’s fake elector case
- Michigan woman charged in deadly car crash was texting, watching movie on phone: Reports
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Scottie Scheffler, from the course to jail and back: what to know about his PGA Championship arrest
Ranking
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Ex-Honolulu prosecutor and five others found not guilty in bribery case
- What to do when facing extended summer power outages
- 17-year-old girl trafficked into U.S. from Mexico rescued after texting 911 and describing landmarks
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- New endangered listing for rare lizard could slow oil and gas drilling in New Mexico and West Texas
- A man investigated in the deaths of women in northwest Oregon has been indicted in 3 killings
- U.S. governors urge Turks and Caicos to release Americans as Florida woman becomes 5th tourist arrested for ammo in luggage
Recommendation
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
How many points did Caitlin Clark score last night? What she did in first home game for Fever
There's a surprising reason why many schools don't have a single Black teacher
Looking to purchase a home? These U.S. cities are the most buyer-friendly.
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
2024 PGA Championship: When it is, how to watch, tee times for golf's second major of year
Kendall Jenner Spotted at Ex Bad Bunny's Concert Following Met Gala After-Party Reunion
What the 'Young Sheldon' finale means: From Jim Parsons' Sheldon return to the last moment