Current:Home > MarketsWendy Williams' guardian tried to block doc to avoid criticism, A&E alleges -ChatGPT
Wendy Williams' guardian tried to block doc to avoid criticism, A&E alleges
View
Date:2025-04-15 19:19:27
A&E Television Networks pushed back against Wendy Williams' temporary guardian in court last month, arguing she moved to block "Where Is Wendy Williams?" from airing to "silence" criticism, according to newly unsealed documents.
Sabrina Morrissey, Williams' temporary guardian, filed a lawsuit against A&E in New York County Supreme Court in February, seeking to stop Lifetime's documentary "Where Is Wendy Williams?" from airing. But in court documents that were recently unsealed and obtained by USA TODAY, Rachel Strom, an attorney for A&E Networks, argued Morrissey tried to shut down the documentary only after seeing the way Williams' guardianship was depicted in the trailer.
"Only after seeing the documentary's trailer and realizing her role in Ms. (Williams') life may be criticized did Ms. Morrissey enlist the courts to unconstitutionally silence that criticism," the filing alleged.
USA TODAY has reached out to an attorney for Morrissey for comment.
In a complaint unsealed earlier this month, Morrissey sought a restraining order against the network, alleging that Williams, who in February announced she was diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia, "was not, and is not, capable of consenting to the terms" of the contract for the documentary.
'Where Is Wendy Williams?':The biggest bombshells from Lifetime's documentary
Williams "did not, and could not, approve the manner in which she was filmed and portrayed in the trailer and documentary," the suit said, alleging the documentary "exploits (Williams') medical condition to portray her in a humiliating, degrading manner and in a false light." The filing also stated that Morrissey was "horrified by the release of the trailer and its contents, which falsely depict (Williams') behavior and demeanor as being the result of intoxication rather than the result of her medical condition."
In its filing, though, A&E's attorney argued Morrissey "took no measures to prevent the documentary's release until she saw the trailer, in which she and the guardianship system appear in a negative light," which "demonstrates that her purpose in seeking this prior restraint is simply to shut down public expression that she does not like."
Wendy Williams'lacked capacity' when she agreed to film Lifetime doc, unsealed filings say
The filing also stated that if Morrissey was "so worried" about Williams being filmed for the documentary, she had "months and months" to intervene. The fact that she did not do so, and "did nothing for nearly a year," is "contrary to the supposed need for emergency relief," A&E argued.
Lifetime, which is owned by A&E Networks, proceeded with airing "Where Is Wendy Williams?" on Feb. 24 and Feb. 25 after an appellate judge said blocking it from airing would be an "impermissible prior restraint on speech" in violation of the First Amendment.
Williams was placed under a financial guardianship in 2022 after Wells Fargo alleged she was "incapacitated." Throughout the Lifetime documentary, Williams' family was critical of the guardianship system, arguing her court-appointed guardian is not taking good care of her and that a family member should serve in that role.
Contributing: KiMi Robinson and Taijuan Moorman, USA TODAY
veryGood! (31)
Related
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- A beginner's guide to getting into gaming
- Nordstrom Anniversary Sale 2023: The Icons' Guide to the Best Early Access Deals
- I'm a Shopping Editor, Here's What I'm Buying During Amazon Prime Day 2023
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- REI fostered a progressive reputation. Then its workers began to unionize
- Tennis Star Naomi Osaka Gives Birth, Welcomes First Baby With Boyfriend Cordae
- Amazon Prime Day 2023: Save 35% on Crest Professional Effects White Strips With 59,600+ 5-Star Reviews
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Vibrating haptic suits give deaf people a new way to feel live music
Ranking
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- A beginner's guide to getting into gaming
- Inflation eases to its lowest in over two years, but it's still running a bit high
- Should we invest more in weather forecasting? It may save your life
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Shein steals artists' designs, a federal racketeering lawsuit says
- 10 million sign up for Meta's Twitter rival app, Threads
- Netflix's pop-up eatery serves up an alternate reality as Hollywood grinds to a halt
Recommendation
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Melanie Griffith Covers Up Antonio Banderas Tattoo With Tribute to Dakota Johnson and Family
Twitter vs. Threads, and why influencers could be the ultimate winners
Inside Clean Energy: A Dirty Scandal for a Clean Energy Leader
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Olaplex Is on Sale for Amazon Prime Day 2023 at a Major Discount: Don’t Miss Out on Shiny, Strong Hair
Meta's Threads wants to become a 'friendly' place by downgrading news and politics
What’s Good for Birds Is Good for People and the Planet. But More Than Half of Bird Species in the U.S. Are in Decline